STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. v. GURSHARAN SINGH AND ORS.

The following Order of the Court was delivered :

Impleadment petition is dismissed. G Leave granted. We have heard learned couosel for the parties.

These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, made on February 2, 1993 in CWP Nos. 1629 and 1976/1992. The Government Engineering H 663

p. 664

A College, Bhatinda with the existing staff was handed over to a society, an autonomous body, as a result of the Government decision dated January 26, 1992. The respondents who are the Government employees filed writ petitions contending that they are not agreeable to further transfer with the institution and pleaded for their absorption in the Government Depart- ~ ments. The High Court in the impugned order has directed to absorb all of them in Government institutions on permanent basis. Feeling aggrieved, these appeals by special leave have been filed by the State Government. It is settled law that a Government servant on abolition of the post is required to be either dismissed from service due to non-availability of post or may be dealt with according to the policy. Similar would be the situation when the Government decides to hand over its institution to a private body. By order of this Court dated April 18, 1996 it was recorded that the 14 named respondents have opted to insist upon their absorption in the Government service and the rest of them have agreed to be absorbed in the institution taken over by the autonomous body. Consequently, we wanted to ascertain from the Government whether it would be possible for the Government to allow them to retain their status as Government servants in any vacancy in any Department and/or in any college under their control Counsel had sought for and permission was given to consider the above suggestion giveri by the learned counsel for the respondents. Pursuant thereto, an affidavit has been filed by Ranjit Singh, Additional Director, Technical Education and Industrial Training, Punjab. in that affidavit, it is stated that the Government have decided to absorb the following seven respondents work- ing in non-teaching staff in the college:

1Copy pinpoint1. Shri Gurjant Singh F

2Copy pinpoint2. Shri Kulwant Singh

3Copy pinpoint3. Shri Ved Prakash

4Copy pinpoint4. Shri Gian Singh G

5Copy pinpoint5. Shri Lakshmi Chand

6c Mrs. Kamaljit Kaur ' .iJl*f ,, ~·

H1 , .,, 7. Shri Surinder Mittal,

STAIB v. GURSHARAN SINGH 665 They have decided to absorb them in the Government service 'A immediately in any of the institutions under the Directorate of Technical Education and Industrial Training, Punjab on the posts in the same scale of pay. The respondents have agreed for the same and therefore, the appellant is directed to absorb them in the same scale of pay in the same post in any of the institutions under the control of the Directorate of ' B Technical Education and Industrial Training, Punjab.

As regards the 5 Lecturers, namely (1) Sh. Prabhjot Singh; (2)'Sh. Manwinder Singh; (3) Sh. Pawan Kapoor; (4) Sh. Amarjit Singh and (5) C Dr. Sarita Chopra it is stated in the affidavit that they were working at the time when the said college was taken over by the Society in the' year 1992, as Lecturers. As a result they were carrying the scale of pay of Rs. 2200-4000 as on the date. It is stated that the Government is prepared to absorb them as Lecturers in any of the Polytechnics of the State under , D the Directorate of Technical Education and Industrial Training, Punjab with a special pay of Rs. 200 per mens um. Shri P.H. Parekh, learned counsel for the respondent, states that even as early as 1992-93 advertise- ment was made for recruitment of Lecturers either with the same scale of pay or lower scale of pay and such recruitment was regularly going on thereafter and as on recently as on October 4, 1996 further advertisement came to be made inviting applications for recruitment. Therefore,' there is no impediment for the Government to absorb them in any of the colleges, instead of Polytechnics, where they can improve their qualifica- tions and chances of service tenure. Even if no vacancies are existing at present, they are prepared to wait till the vacancies arise. We are of the view that the suggestion made by Shri P.H. Parekh appears to be reasonable. Undoubtedly, they have been working as Lecturers in the colleges which are Government colleges with status as Government . servants. Under these circumstances, it would be appropriate to absorb them in any of the colleges instead of Poly-technical Institutions. There- ' G fore, the appellants are directed to absorb them in any of the colleges as Lecturers in the same scale of pay. If there are no vacancies as at present, they are directed to be absorbed as and when vacancies arise. Until then, the respondents are directed to work in the Poly-technical Institutions as lecturers, as suggested in the counter-affida·lit. ·H

=

p. 666

A Professor Inderjit Singh is working in the scale of pay of Rs. 4500-7300. It is stated in the affidavit that there is no equivalent post but the post of Executive Engineer in Public Health Department, Punjab in the grade of Rs. 3000-4500 is available. Therefore, if he is agreeable, Government have no objection to absorb him in the said post but subject B to the result of enquiry pending against him. In the affidavit filed by lnderjit Singh, he has stated that according to his information, as may as five posts of Principals in the Polytechnics are available in the scale of pay of Rs. 4125-5600. He is prepared for his absorption in any one of those institutions or any institution in which the vacancy may be available. C Therefore, instead of sending him as an Executive Engineer, he may be absorbed as a Principal of any Poly-technical Institution, i.e., teaching institution in which he is working as a teaching staff. Subject to the Rules of recruitment of the Principa~ the Government is directed to consider him for absorption as a Principal in any of the five institutions named by D him, viz., (i) Post of Princip~ government Polytechnic at Khooni Mazra, District Ropar; (ii) Principal of Government Polytechnic Lehna Ganga, District Sangrur; (iii) Post of Principal Government Polytechnic Bhikhi- wind, District Amritsar; (iv) Post of Principal, Government Polytechnic for Women at Patiala; and (v) Post of Principal Government Polytechnic for Women at Amritsar or any of the institutions that may be available. E It is made clear that this absorption will subject be to the following conditions:

"(i) In the event of pending enquiry results against him, then this absorption would not stand in the way of the appellants for taking such disciplinary action as is available according to the Rules;

(ii) In the event of his exoneration from the charge in the departmental enquiry, he will be fitted into the scale of pay of Rs. 4125-5600 subject to he is drawing the present scale of pay as on the taking over in 1992 as special pay to him; G (iii) His fitment as Principal will be in accordance with the Rules applicable to the Rules and his fulfilling the qualifications.

As regards Dr. G.S. Sekhon, he is at present working as Assistant H Professor in the scale of pay of Rs. 3700-5700. It is stated in the affidavit

STATE v. GURSHARAN SINGH 667 and also rejoinder affidavit filed that the Department of Technical Educa- A tion had written to Education Department to make efforts to find an equivalent grade for placement of Dr. Sekhon. Education Department has reported that Lecturers appointed pursuant to the selection by the Punjab Public Service Commission in the colleges, are recruited in the grade of Rs. 2200-4000. Therefore, it is difficult to adjust him in the scale of Rs. B 3700-5700. Govermnent, therefore, has decided to absorb him as a Lecturer in the scale of Rs. 2200-4000 with a special pay of Rs. 200. If it is agreeable to the respondent, the Govermnent have no objection for his absorption as a Lecturer. It is stated in the affidavit filed by Dr. Sekhon that he has no objection for being absorbed as a Lecturer in the scale of pay of Rs. 2200-4000. Under these circumstances, the appellants are directed to ab- C sorb him as a Lecturer in Physics and Mathematics in any of the Govern- ment Colleges in the scale of pay of Rs. 2200-4000 protecting his last drawn scale of pay in 1992 in the scale of Rs. 3700-4700 with a special pay.

Mr. Pawan Kapoor and Amarjit Singh are presently working as a D Lecturers in the subject of Mechanical Engineering in the College of Engineering taken over by the Society. Though in his affidavit Shri Ranjit Singh, Additional Director has not dealt with their claims for absorption in the Government service, in the affidavit filed by Dr. Sekhon in para 15, it is stated as under: E '"That the respondent No. 13 and 18 are teaching as lecturer in the subject of Mechanical Engineering in the College of Engineering and Technology, Bhatinda. They can be absorbed against the posts of S.D .E. Irrigation Department; Assistant Divisional Manager (Store/Purchase) State Transport Department; Assistant Director F of factories Labour Department; S.D.E. Public Health Department and S.D.E: (B&R) Department of Punjab Governllient. To the best of knowledge two posts of S.D.E. Irrigation Department are lying vacant with the Government of Punjab." I In view of the above statement, we think that if there is no post available in any of the Engineering Colleges for absorption as Lecturer, it will be open to the Government to absorb them as Sub-Divisional En- gineers in Irrigation Department, Assistant Divisional Manager (Store/Pur- chase) State Transport Department; Assistant Director of factories Labou• Department; S.D.E. (B&R) Department of Punjab Government. There- H

p. 668

A fore, it is open to the Government-appellant to absorb the two persons in any of those posts mentioned or any equivalent post to which the Rules of recruitment would permit.

The appeals are accordingly disposed of. No costs.

T.N.A. Appeals disposed of.