RAJPAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

vidhipandit.com/case/sc-s-1995-5-481-482

Judgment · Supreme Court of India · decided (year only) · Bench: K. RAMASWAMY and B.L. HANSARIA

[1995] Supp. 5 S.C.R. 481

Headnote — Supreme Court Reports (editorial summary, not part of the judgment)

Allowing the appeal, this Court

Held

1. Since the persons similarly situated were admittedly taken into service and their services have been regularised, the appellant, who is the only person left out in the field, also stands in the same position. On this special circumstances, he is also entitled to the same relief. [482-B] E

Reporter's headnote (continued) and case details

NOVEMBER 20, 1995

B

Service Law:

Regulmisation-Similarly situated persons already regularised-Appel- lant to be taken into se1vice and regularised-However, he will not be entitled C to back wages but shall get all other consequential benefits.

In this appeal against the High Court's order, the appellant prayed for regularisation.

2. The respondents are directed to take the appellant int9 service within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of this order. But the appellant would not be entitled to the back-wages; he would, however, get all other consequential benefits. [482-C)

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 11401 of F 1995.

From the Judgment and Order dated 8.9.92 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in RS.A. No. 1065 of 1992.

S.M. Hooda, Mahinder Singh Dahiya for the Appellant. G

Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal and Ms. lndu Malhotra for the Respondents.

Judgment

The following Order of the Court was delivered :

Delay condoned. H 481

p. 482

A Leave granted.

In view of the order passed by this Court in S.L.P. (C) Nos. 3099- 3100/85 & batch, the persons similarly situated were admittedly taken into service and their services have been regularised. Under these circumstan- ces, since the appellant, who is the only person left out in the field, also stands in the same position, we think, on this special circumstances, he is also entitled to the same relief.

The appeal is accordingly allowed. But the appellant would not be entitled to the back-wages; he would, however, get all other consequential benefits. The respondents are directed to take the appellant into service within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of this order.

G.N. Appeal allowed.

Report an error in this judgment →

Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0