STATE OF M.P. v. SURESH GUPTA AND ANR.
vidhipandit.com/case/sc-s-1995-3-456-457
Decision dates shown here are day-precision where the judgment's own text states a date the extractor is confident in, and year only otherwise -- never a fabricated day. See the editorial policy for how dates are extracted.
Headnote — Supreme Court Reports (editorial summary, not part of the judgment)
Held
The Courts below are free to dispose of all the pending or . connected matters between the parties on their merits without being influenced by any of the findings and observations made by the High Court in the impugned order. (457-B]
Reporter's headnote (continued) and case details
A
SEPTEMBER 8, 1995
B
Oiminal Appeal-Pending cases-Disposal by Cowts below-Direc- tions regarding.
Regarding certain matters pending between the parties; c Disposing the appeal, this Court
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal Nos. 1085-86 of 1995.
From the Judgment and Order dated 5.5.95 & 27.4.95 of the Madhya E Pradesh High Court in W.P. Nos. 671 & 596 of 1995.
P.P. Rao, Uma Nath Singh for the Appellant.
U.R. Lalit and D.D. Thakur, B.K. Satija, Vipin Gogia, S.K. Jain A.P. Dhamija, P.R. Jain, Vivek Gambhir, Anil Kumar S.K. Gambhir and K. G. F Maheshwari for the Respondents.
Judgment
The following Order of the Court was delivered :
Leave granted. G We have heard learned counsel for the parties. The respondent, Sadhvi Rithambara, has already been released. It is stated by Shri D.D. Thakur, learned senior counsel for the respondent, that the State would be free to proceed with the pending matters, i.e., not only concerned F.I.R. but also the other connected matters between the parties. The courts below would proceed and decide the cases uninfluenced by any of the findings 456
STATE v. S. GUPTA 457
and observations made by the High Court in the impugned order and purely based on the merits of the case. Shri P.P. Rao, learned senior counsel for the appellant, has very fairly agreed for this suggestion.
In view of the above very fair stand taken by both the counsel, we reiterate that the courts below are free to dispose of all the pending or connected matters between the parties on their merits without being influenced by any of the findings and observations made by the High Court in the impugned order.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
T.N.A. Appeal disposed of. C
Report an error in this judgment →
Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0