_A RAGHU SEEDS AND FARMS AND OTHERS ETC. v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B YOGESHWAR DAYAL, J. By Transferred Case Nos. 4, 5 and 48 of 1986 and Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 15337-15338 of 1984 the petitioners herein have challenged the constitutional validity of the Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 purported to have been issued in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (hereinafter C referred to as 'the Act') as being unconstitutional, ultra vires and void, The petitioners have also challenged the declaration of seeds of food-crops &nd seeds of fruits and vegetables as the essential commodities by the Govern- ment of India, Ministry 0 of Civil Supplies contained in the order dated 24th February, 1983 also issued under the Act. · D Section 2 of the Act is the definitions section and inter alia clause (a) thereof defines "essential commodity". The relevant part of clause (a) reads as follows:

"(a) "essential commodity" means any of the following classes of E commodities -

(i) cattle fodder, including oilcakes and other concentrates;

(ii) coal, including coke and other derivatives;

F (iii) component parts and accessories of automobiles;

(iv) cotton and woolen textiles; - (iva) drugs,

G Explanation - In this sub-clause "drug" has the meaning assigned to it in clause (b) of Section 3 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (23 of 1940);

(v) foodstuffs, including edible oilseeds and oils ;

H (vi)

RAGtHJ SEEDSv. U.Q.I. [DAYAL,J.] 483

(vii) A (viii)

(ix)

(x) B (xi) any other class of corpmoclity which the Central Government may, by notified order, declare to be an essential commodity for the purposes of this Act, being a commodity with respect to which Parliament has power to '1lake laws by virtue of Entry 33 in List ID ln the Seventh Schedqle to the Constitution;" C , By the impugned notified order dated 34th February, 1983 the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- clause (xi) of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Act decl!ifed the following seeds used of sowing or planting (including i;eedfuigs and tubers, bulbs rhinzomes, roots, D cuttings and all types of graftii and other vegetatively propagated material of foods crops or cattle fodder) to be essential commodities for the purpose of the said Act, namely -

"(i) Seeds of food-crops and seeds of fruits and vegetables; E (ii) Seeds of cattle fodder and

(iii) jute seeds. •

After issuing the said notified order declaring inter alia the seed of food-crops and seeds of fruits and vegetables as essential commodities the F Central Ooveroment issued the impugned Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 purported to be in exercise of the. powers conferred by Section 3 of the Act. It inter alia contemplates that th~ persons carrying on business of selling, exporting or importing seeds to obtain licence. ·It also inter alia provides for grant and/or refusal of the licence; renewal of the licence and G various ancilliary provisions for suspension, cancellation of licence and submissions of various returns including provision of punishment for viola- tion of the Seeds (Control) Order, 1983.

The basic question involved iJl these matters is the validity of the 11otified order dated 24th February, 1983 whereby inter alia seeds of H

484 SUPRErvi:E COURT REPORTS (1993) SUPP. 3 S.C.R.

A · food-crops and seeds of fruits and vegetables have been declared as essential commodities for the purposes of the Act. The validity of the notified order inter alia is challenged on the ground that the seeds of food-crops and seeds of fruits and vegetables are not class of commodities which could be declared by the Central Government as essential com- B modities for the purposes of the Act. The argument is that it is so because such a commodity is not a commodity in respect of which the Parliament has powers to make law by virtue of Entry 33 of List III of the Vllth Schedule to the Constitution of India. Entry 33 of List III of the Vllth Schedule to the Constitution of India reads as follows :

C "33. Trade an commerce in, and the production, supply and dis- tribution of, -

(a)

(b) Foodstuffs, .including edible oilseeds and oils; D (c)

(d)

(e) E It is clear that the aforesaid Entry 33 deals with not merely trade and commerce in, but also in the production, supply and distribution of, various products and articles mentioned in clauses (a) to (e) thereof. Clause (b) of Entry 33 n;:tentions 'foodstuffs' as a class of commodity wlµch includes edible oilseeds and oils. The main thing to be noticed in that the Entry F deals with not merely trade and commerce in foodstuffs but also in relation thereof in production, supply and distribution as well. Once it is clear that Entry 33 deals with production,· it is obvious that the seeds are a vital commodity having direct connection with the production of the foodstuffs to which it relates. Therefore, seeds of foodstuffs is an item which has G direct bearing with the production of the foodstuffs and consequently it is competent for the Parliament as well as States to make laws in relation to seeds o( foodstuffs. Surely seeds of food-crops and seeds of fruits and vegetables relate to foodstuffs.

The various entires in three lists are fields of legislation. See Calcutta H Gas Company (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of West Bengal and others, AIR

RAGHUSEEDSv. U.0.1. (DAYAL,J.) 485

(1962) S.C. 1044 and Harakchand Ratanchand Banthia and others etc. v. A Union of India and others, [1970] 1 S.C.R. 479 at 489.

Again it is well established that the language of the various entries sh~uld be given the widest scope of which their meaning is fairly capable.

Therefore there is no doubt that the notified order dated 24th B February 1983 was intra vires the powers conferred by sub· clause (xi) of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Act. Once the said notified order becomes valid, the Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 is within the power of the Central Government under Section 3 of the Act

These petitions, therefore, fail and are dismissed with costs. C G.N. Petitions dismissed.