Pooja v. State of U.P. & Anr.
Tools
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- Citation
- 2026 INSC 1119 · Not reported in the Supreme Court Reports
No public source-PDF link for this document.
Judgment
Non-Reportable 2026 INSC 1119 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Criminal Appeal No.4902 of 2026 [ @ Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.6715 of 2026 ]
Pooja ...Appellant Versus State of U.P. & Anr. ...Respondents
ORDER
Leave granted.
2. The above matter is filed to quash the
proceedings in Case No.16720 of 2024 (Case Crime
No.94 of 2024, registered at Police Station Chhapar)
pending in the Court of the learned Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate-I, Muzaffarnagar. The allegation is
that the appellant deliberately gave false information
and forged the death certificate of her mother, which
showed the date of death as 21.11.2019, which was
actually 20.11.2019.
3. The certificate showing the date of birth is
Signature Not Verified Annexure P1, issued by the Competent Authority Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND
under the Panchayati Raj Vibhag of the Government Date: 2026.10.14 10:55:03 IST Reason:
of Uttar Pradesh. The same has been obtained on an
Page 1 of 4
online application made by the appellant.
Subsequently, one Sanjay Kumar, a person unknown
to the appellant and not connected to her family,
made a complaint that the death was actually on
20.11.2019. On enquiry, the District Panchayat Raj
Officer, Muzaffarnagar found that the date as
furnished by the appellant was wrong and hence, he
is said to have initiated an investigation by an FIR
numbered as 94 of 2024 before the Police Station
Chhapar produced as Annexure P4. Subsequently, a
charge-sheet has been filed, produced as Annexure
P5, on which cognizance is said to have been taken
as per Annexure P6 by the learned Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate-I Muzaffarnagar.
4. The appellant contends that there were disputes
with her sister and civil suits were pending between
them. A settlement was arrived at, despite which the
sister has instigated the filing of the above complaint.
In fact, the appellant’s case was that she was
informed by her sister about her mother’s death and
she only made an application on the bona fide belief
that the date was correct. She also submits that she
Page 2 of 4
had made the application through a Jan Sewa Kendra
as she is not technically savvy.
5. Admittedly, the certificate is issued by the
Competent Authority of the Panchayati Raj Vibhag
and there cannot be found any forgery or criminal
breach of trust in the issuance of the certificate. That
the wrong date was furnished cannot lead to an
allegation of an offence under Section 420 or Section
465 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). In any
event, the date of death was corrected and there is
no allegation against the appellant that she used the
death certificate to get any benefits. The date could
also be a mistake, since the actual death was on
20.11.2019 and the date of death furnished by the
appellant was 21.11.2019.
6. We are of the opinion that no useful purpose
would be served in continuing the prosecution. We
hence quash the proceedings in Case No.16720 of
2024; arising from the Crime No.94 of 2024, pending
before the learned Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate’s Court-I, Muzaffarnagar.
Page 3 of 4
7. The appeal is allowed.
8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand
rejected.
.......…….……………………. J. (J. B. PARDIWALA)
....……….……………………. J. (K. VINOD CHANDRAN)
NEW DELHI; OCTOBER 12, 2026.
Page 4 of 4
Report an error in this judgment →
Source: Supreme Court of India (www.sci.gov.in). Judgment text as published on the Court's website.