ROHITH THAMMANA GOWDA v. RAJINI NALINI RAMESH

Headnote — Supreme Court Reports (editorial summary, not part of the judgment)

(Conmt. Pet.(C) No. 461/2022 in C.A. No. 4987/2022) Judgment/Order – Additional direction –

Held

Directions were issued in Paragraph 18 of the judgment dated 29.07.2022 – In addition to that, petitioner-husband directed to not take any C coercive steps against the respondent-wife in any of the proceedings pending in the Superior Court of Washington, County of King, USA – Further, both the parties directed to file a joint application before the Superior Court of Washington, County of King, USA for mirroring the judgment dated 29.07.2022. D CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Conmt.Pet.(C) No. 461 of 2022 in C.A. No. 4987 of 2022. Petition filed for willful disobedience of the judgment dated 29.07.2022 in Civil Appeal No. 4987 of 2022 passed by the Supreme Court of India. E With M.A. No. 1368 of 2022 in C.A. No. 4987/2022, M.A. No. 1369 of 2022 in C.A. No. 4987 of 2022. R. Basant, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv., Siddhant Buxy, Manu Krishnan, Krishna Sumanth, Vivek Jain, Ms. Suchitra Kambhat, Abhinav F Jain, Prabhajit Johar, Panveer Talwar, S. S. Jauhar, Advs. for the appearing parties