Judgment sc-2022-2-819-819
vidhipandit.com/case/sc-2022-2-819-819
Headnote — Supreme Court Reports (editorial summary, not part of the judgment)
Reporter's headnote (continued) and case details
819
RE: VIJAY KURLE & ORS. A (Miscellaneous Application No. 486 of 2022) In (Suo Motu Contempt Petition (CRL.) No. 2 of 2019)
Judgment/Order – Correction of typographical error – In paragraph no.7, ‘92) of Article 142’ to be read as ‘(2) of Article 142’ – Miscellaneous application allowed. INHERENT JURISDICTION: Miscellaneous Application No. 486 C of 2022 In Suo Moto Contempt Petition (CRL.) No. 2 of 2019. From the Judgment and Order dated 04.05.2020 in SMC (Crl) No.2 of 2019 of this Court. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv., Nitin Saluja, Nilesh C. Ojha, Prem Sunder Jha, Ishwarlal S. Agarwal, Ms. Dipali N. Ojha, Pratik Jain Saklecha, D Abhishek Mishra, Ms. Siddhi A. Dhamnaskar, Ms. Snehal S. Surve, Ms. Poonam P. Rajbhar, Ms. Deepika G. Jaiswal, Mangesh B. Dongre, Sohan R. Agate, Pritam Bishwas, Anant Misra Advs. for the appearing parties.
Judgment
The following Order of the Court was passed: ORDER E
In terms of the office report, the suggested corrigendum, as stated infra, be carried out in the judgment delivered on 27-04-2020:-
F
M.A. No. 486 of 2022 stands allowed. G
Ankit Gyan Petition allowed.
H 819
Report an error in this judgment →
Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0