IN RE: T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

p. 1166 Copy page pinpoint

A or in the periphery of the said sanctuary shall be made by the CEC. Recommendations shall be made within a period of four months before this Court in the form of an application. This Court shall consider passing appropriate order upon going through such application. The exercise concerning such reparation, including quantifying compensation shall be undertaken upon giving the mining operator, State and MoEF&CC opportunity of hearing. (p) In the event there is any subsisting order of any High Court or any Court subordinate to such High Court covering any of the issues dealt with by this Court in this order, this order shall prevail over any such order which may be contrary to these directions. (q) We have already observed that there are certain overlapping issues involved in this writ petition and the cases of Goa Foundation (Writ Petition (C) No.460 of 2004) and (Writ D Petition (C) No.435 of 2012). We request the Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India to consider having the present writ petition i.e. In Re:T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) No.460 of 2004 (Goa Foundation v. Union of India) as also W.P. (C) No.435 E of 2012 (Goa Foundation v. Union of India & Ors.) be heard together before the same Bench. The registry may place this order before the Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India.

45Copy pinpoint45. This order disposes of I.A. No.1000 of 2003 in the above F terms.

46Copy pinpoint46. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Ankit Gyan I.A. disposed of (Assisted by : Adnan Khan, LCRA) G