AVNI PRAKASH v. NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY (NTA) & ORS.

Tools
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
Bench
DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD and A. S. BOPANNA
Citation
[2021] 11 S.C.R. 891
Whole judgment (for printing)

Source PDF (original scan)
Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0

Judgment · Supreme Court of India · decided · Bench: DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD and A. S. BOPANNA

[2021] 11 S.C.R. 891

A (vi) It was brought to our notice that the second respondent was ignorant about the facilities to which the appellant was entitled. There was an evident confusion between the authorities working at the first respondent as well. The persons working for the first respondent and exam centres like that of the second respondent should be sensitised and trained, on a regular basis, to deal with requirements of reasonable accommodation raised by PwDs.

5858. The steps taken by the first respondent in furtherance of direction (ii) above in Paragraph 57 must be communicated to the Registry of this Court by filing a status report within a period of two weeks from the date of this judgment.

5959. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

6060. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

D Nidhi Jain Appeal disposed of.

Report an error in this judgment →

Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0