ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

vidhipandit.com/case/sc-2018-7-765-766

Supreme Court of India (SC) · decided · J. CHELAMESWAR and SANJAY KISHAN KAUL · judgment

[2018] 7 S.C.R. 765

Headnote — Supreme Court Reports (editorial summary, not part of the judgment)

Reporter's headnote (continued) and case details

765

(Civil Appeal No. 877 of 2018) B Jharkhand Judicial Service (Recruitment) Rules, 2004 – rr.21, 22 and 27 – In Judgment dated 11.5.2018 titled Ashok Kumar & C Ors. v. State of Jharkhand and reported in [2017] 7 SCR 755, paragraphs 25 and 26 stand deleted – Further paragraph 27 to be read as “the respondent will ensure that the differential mandatory benefits including increments are remitted to the appellants within a period of three months from the date of the order” . D CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 877 of 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 03.03.2016 of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in W. P. (S) No. 5186 of 2014. E Amit Gupta, Ms. Mansi Kukreja (For M/s. Mitter & Mitter Co.), Advs. for the Appellants. Tapesh Kumar Singh, Mohd. Waquas, Aditya Pratap Singh, Chandra Bhushan Prasad, Advs. for the Respondents.

Judgment

The following Order of the Court was passed: F

ORDER On the matter being mentioned, the learned counsel for the parties stated that there may not be necessity of a direction as contained in paragraphs 25 and 26 of the judgment passed by this Court on 11.5.2018, G which accordingly stand deleted. They further plead that paragraph 27 of the said judgment may be read as under:

H 765

p. 766

A “The respondent will ensure that the differential mandatory benefits including increments are remitted to the appellants within a period of three months from the date of the order.” Ordered accordingly.

Devika Gujral Modification in earlier order. B

C

D

E

F

G

H

Report an error in this judgment →

Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0