STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. v. NEELAM NAG & ANR.
vidhipandit.com/case/sc-2016-8-436-436
Headnote — Supreme Court Reports (editorial summary, not part of the judgment)
Reporter's headnote (continued) and case details
p. 436
A (Civil Appeal No. 4715of2011) Judgment/Order - Modification/correction - To be treated as . part of the judgment reported in [2016] 5 SCR 278- Word "Neelam C Nag" in the cause title to be read as "Neelam Nag & Am: - Word "respondent" in the judgment to be read as "respondent No. l ". CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4715 of201 l. From the Judgment and Order dated 28.06.2010 of the High Court D of Judicature at Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh in WA 80 of2010. K. V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv, Sanjay Kapur, Anmol Chandan, Ms. Priyanka Das, Ms. Shubhra Kapur, Advs. for the Appellants. Atul Jha, Sandeep Jha, Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, R. B. Sharma, Akshat Shrivastava, Ms. Manjeet Kirpal, Advs. for the Respondents. E
Judgment
The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER The following modification/correction shall be treated as part of the judgment dated 16.09.2016 in the aforementioned appeal:- F (i) The word "Neelam Nag" in the cause title shall be read as " Neelam Nag & Anr." (ii) The word "respondent" whereever referred in the judgment shall be read as "respondent No. I". G ~ Nidhi Jain Modification in earlier judgment
436
Report an error in this judgment →
Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0