UNION OF INDIA & ORS. v. CHATRO DEVI & ORS.
vidhipandit.com/case/sc-2014-8-781-782
Headnote — Supreme Court Reports (editorial summary, not part of the judgment)
Catchwords
Land Acquisition Act, 1894: s.5-A - Objections filed by tenure-holders uls. 5-A - Subsequent proceedings quashed C -
Held
In view of C.A. No. 5478-8312014, State's appeal is dismissed.
Reporter's headnote (continued) and case details
p. 781
(Civil Appeal Nos. 1831-1836 of 2009) MAY 07, 2014 B
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal Nos. 1831-1836 of 2009. D From the Judgment and Order dated 11.05i.2007 of the High Court of Delhi in W.P. (C) Nos. 424 of 19817, 2746 of 1985, 2815 of 1985, 607 of 1987, 2469 of 1985 aAd 1950 of 1985. ·E WITH
C.A. Nos. 903 of 2010, 7439 of 2009, 8483 of 2003, 5484- 88, 5489-94, 5495-98, 5499-501 of 2014.
P. P. Malhotra, ASG, J. S. Attri, Geeta Luthra, Sanjay F Poddar, Vinay Bhasin, Mukul Rohatgi, Gopal Jain, Shyam Divan, A. Sharan, Sandeep Bajaj, Siddharth Panda, D. S. Mahra, Anshuman Nayak, Shadman Ali, Gaurav Sharma, Chetan Chawla, Govind Kumar, Sonia Malhotra, Priyanka Bharihoke, Yasir Rauf, Pradeep Misra, Daleep Kr. Dhayani, D. G N. Goburdhan, Narendra Goyal, Naina Dubey, Rohit Bhardwaj, Anil Katiyar, H. S. Raina, Bhargava V. Desai, Shreyas Mehrotra, R. N. Karanjawala, Manik Karanjawala, Ruby Singh Ahuja, Krishna Hariani, Rohit Sharma, Aakanksha Munjhal, 781 H
p. 782
A Karanjawala & Co.. , S. S. Khanduja, Archana Sharma, Meenakshi Kalra, Shobha, Yash Pal Dhingra, Indra Sawhney, Simran Mehta, Arvind Minocha, Veena· Minocha, Sumit Bansal, Ateev Mathur, Richa Oberoi, Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Pankaj Gupta, Anusuya Salwan, S. Janani, Kunal Kohli, G. Umapathy, B Rakesh K. Sharma, Venkatasubramanian, S. Ramasubramanian, R. Mekhala, P. V. Yogeswaran, Manish Kumar, Amit Kumar, Piyush Kaushik, Rakesh K. Sharma, N. S. Vasisht, Pradeep Misra, Daleep Kr. Dhayani, Sumit Bansal, Gagan Gupta, Ateev P. Mathur, Vishnu B. Saharya (for Saharya c & Co.), Advocates, with them for the appearing parties.
Judgment
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
ORDER
0 1. The facts and issue involved/ in the abovesaid appeals are identical and have to be decided in terms of our judgment passed today in Civil Appeal Nos. 5478-5483 of 2014.
2. The appeals are dismissed in terms thereof. No order as to costs. E Devika Gujral Appeals dismissed.
Report an error in this judgment →
Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0