MOTi RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ANR. v. ASHOK KUMAR & ANR.

The following Order of the Court was delivered

810 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 14 (ADDL.) S.C.R.

A. ORDER

On 31 81 August, 2010, we had referred the matter for mediation to the Mediation Centre at Chandigarh to attempt to resolve the dispute between the parties. B Today, when the matter was called out, our Court Secretary placed before us the Report dated 29th September, 2010 received from the Mediator, which is as foliows:

"Mr. Ashok Kumar states that he would be ready and willing c to vacate the shop on receipt of 1/3rd of the value of the shop which according to him is worth approximately 50 Lacs and he be paid an amount of 15 Lacs (approx.). The appellant-landlord is not ready and willing to offer the said amount and has extended the concession by giving up on D the pending rent only which according to him is pending for last 28 years. Tenant has also expressed his willingness to purchase the property for an amount of Rs. 30 Lacs but the landlord has refused to dispose of the same on the ground of personal necessity. E In this connection, we would like to state mediation proceedings are totally confidential proceeding. This is unlike proceedings in Court which are conducted openly in the public gaze. If the mediation succeeds, by both the parties to the Court without mentioning what transpired during the mediation proceedings. If the mediation is unsuccessful, then the mediator should only write one sentence in his report and send it to the Court stating that the 'Mediation has been unsuccessful'. BeyondJhat, the mediator should not write anything which was discussed, proposed or done during the mediation proceedings. This is because in mediation, very often, offers, counter offers and proposals are made by the parties but until and unless the parties reach to an agreement signed by them, it will not amount to any concluded contract. If the happenings in the mediation proceedings are disclosed, it will destroy the confidentiality of the mediation process.

MOTi RAM (D) THR. LRS. & ANR. v. ASHOK KUMAR 811 &ANR. We are compelled to observe this because the mediators should know what kind of reports they should send to the Courts. The report sent in this core should not have mentioned the proposals made by the parties, but should only have stated that the mediation was unsuccessful. B Let a copy of this order be sent to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre and the Mediation Centres in all the High Courts and Di~trict Courts in the country, including the Chandigarh Mediation Centre

So far as this case is concerned, at the request of the counsel for tile appellants, list this matter in January 2011.

R.P. Matter adjourned.