\ GOVERDHAN DASS BANSAL v. STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION) TH. SECRETARY
vidhipandit.com/case/sc-2008-15-307-308
Headnote — Supreme Court Reports (editorial summary, not part of the judgment)
~ t Practice and procedure - Revision - Disposal of, on the day of admission by cryptic and non-reasoned order - c Propriety of -
Held
Not proper- Since the court felt that there was some arguable points, the revision petition was admitted - If there was no substance, it should not have been admitted - Thus, order of High Court set aside and matter remitted back to it for fresh disposal - Judgment/Order - Revision - D Food Adulteration Act, 1948.
Reporter's headnote (continued) and case details
p. 307
\ GOVERDHAN DASS BANSAL A ,. ~ v. STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION) TH. SECRETARY (Criminal Appeal No. 55 of 2002.)
OCTOBER 22, 2008 B
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 55 of 2002.
From the final Judgment and Order dated 17.4.2001 of the E High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal Revision No. 206 of 2001.
Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv., Prasanth P. and T. Harish Kumar for the Appellant. r- F Ashok Bhan, Ahsa G. Nair, Anil Katiyar and D.S. Mahra for the Respondent.
Judgment
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. 1. Heard.
2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court in Criminal
Report an error in this judgment →
Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0