STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. CHANDA@ CHANDKORI AND ORS
vidhipandit.com/case/sc-2007-10-290-291
Decision dates shown here are day-precision where the judgment's own text states a date the extractor is confident in, and year only otherwise -- never a fabricated day. See the editorial policy for how dates are extracted.
Headnote — Supreme Court Reports (editorial summary, not part of the judgment)
Appiication /or leave to appeal against acquittal-Rejected by c High Court by a cryptic order-
Held
While.disposing ofan application for leave to appeal against an acquittal, it is expected that High Court shouldpass a speaking order showing due application ofmind-Since that has not been done in the instant case, order ofHigh Court is set aside and the matter remitted back to it for passing an order after showing due application of mind
Delay-Condonation of-260 days delay in filing Special Leave Petition by Government-
Held
Ordinarily Court would not condone such a long delay-Such kind of delay causes grave injustice to the parties-However, in the peculiar facts and circumstances ofthe case, delay condoned-Constitution ofIndia-Article 136. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No. 1293of2007. ..j F From the Judgment and Order dated 14.07.2005 of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench in.D.B. Criminal Leave to Appeal No. 165of2005. Manish Kumar and Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary for the Appellant. G B.S. Jain, Ajay Veer Singh, Mamta Jain, Neha Tiwari and Dr. Vipin Gupta for the Respondents. )---
Reporter's headnote (continued) and case details
A STATE OF RAJASTHAN ·.?- . v. CHANDA@ CHANDKORI AND ORS
SEPTEMBER 24, 2007 B
Code a/Criminal Procedure, 1973: -'(-
Judgment
The following Order of the Court was delivered:
H 290
STATEOFRAJASTHANv. CHANDA@CHANDKORI 291
We have heard learned counsels for the parties. A
Delay condoned. Leave granted. This appeal is barred by time by 260 days. Ordinarily we may not B have condoned such a long delay, and we do not appreciate the delays caused in filing Special Leave Petitions by the Government before this Court. Such kind of delay causes grave injustice to the parties. However, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we condone the delay. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 14th July C 2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench, Jaipur in D.B. Criminal Leave to appeal No. 165 of2005 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court had passed a cryptic order dismissing the application for leave to appeal against as acquittal judgment without giving proper reasons and without showing due application of mind. While disposing of an application for leave to appeal against an acquittal, it is expected that the High Court should pass a speaking order showing due application of mind. Of Course the said order need not be as elaborate as a full fledged judgment, but at least briefly some reasons should be given. That has not been done in this case. Hence we cannot sustain the impugned order dated 14th July 2005 passed by the High Court. We set aside the order of the High Court and remit the matter back to the High Court for passing an order after showing due application of mind. The appeal is accordingly, allowed. RP. Appeal allowed.
Report an error in this judgment →
Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0