ST ATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS. v. ABDUL MAJID

D The Judgment of the Court was delivered by

DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN, J. : Leave granted.

2Copy pinpoint2. Heard Mr.Altaf H.Nayak, learned Advocate-General for the State of Jammu & Kashmir and Mr.Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent. E

3Copy pinpoint3. The appeal is directed against an interim order dt.03.04.2006 passed by the High Court in LPA(SW) No.8112006 and CMP No.53/2006 arising out ofSWP No.1513/2004.

4Copy pinpoint4. The learned Single Judge of the High Court while disposing of the Writ Petition filed by the respondent herein issued the following directions:-

"(I) pay to the petitioner minimum wages as payable under the Minimum Wages Act w.e.f. January, 1992 at such rates as were prevalent from time to time. G

2. petitioner be considered for regularization as' class iv.

3. Petitioner be brought on regular establishment as helper/ class-IV whichever be the lowest post available on the regular establishment of the department within a period of two months. H

STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR v. ABDUL MAJID [LAKSHMANAN, J.] 215

4. Non-observance of this direction within the stipulate"d period A will amount to commission of contempt of court.

·Registrar Judicial shall place this file before this court on the expiry of two months. Copy of this Order shall be furnished to Mrs.Neeru Goswami • - appearing for respondents for compliance."

5Copy pinpoint5. Aggrieved against the said order, the State has preferred the Letters B

Patent Appeal which was taken on file as LPA No.8112006. The State challenged the correctness of the directions issued by the learned Single Judge in the Letters Patent Appeal. Admittedly, the Letters· Patent Appeal filed by the State is pending final disposal. In the meanwhile, the High Court C directed the State to deposit the wages of the respondent in accordance with the terms of Minimum Wages Act from January, 1992 to ending March, 2006 and pay this amount to the respondent within two weeks from 03.04.2006. The court has also observed that subject to the above, direction Nos.3 and 4 of the learned Single Judge shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing. Aggrieved by the said order, the state has preferred the above appeal in this D Court. This Court on 17.07.2006 issued notice on the Special Leave Petition as also on the prayer for interim relief.

6Copy pinpoint6. As noticed earlier, the Letters Patent Appeal is still pending in the High Court. The State has questioned the correctness of the directions E issued by the learned Single Judge in the Letters Patent Appeal. In the meanwhile, the learned Judges of the Division Bench of the High Court directed the State to deposit the wages of the respondent in accordance with the terms of Minimum Wages Act from January, 1992 to ending March, 2006 and pay the said amount to the respondent within two weeks from 03.04.2006. F The said direction to pay the amount to the respondent within two weeks pending disposal of the Letters Patent Appeal, in our opinion, is not warranted at this stage. However, we are not inclined to set aside the direction issued by the Division Bench directing the State to deposit the wages of the respondent in accordance with the terms of Minimum Wages Act from January, 1992 to ending March, 2006. Therefore, we give further G time to the State by four weeks to comply with the direction in regard to the deposit of the minimum wages. The said amount shall be deposited with the Registrar General of the High. Court subject to the final outcome of the Letters Patent Appeal. On such deposit, the Registrar General is directed H

p. 216

A to invest the same in a short term fixed deposit in a nationalised bank.

7Copy pinpoint7. We request the High Court to dispose of the Letters Patent Appeal within three months from the date of receipt of this Order from this Court or on production of the same by either party. •

8Copy pinpoint8. The appeal stands disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

RP. Appeal disposed of.

.(