PROF. YASHPAL AND ANR. v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS.

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G G.P. MATHUR, J. I. Professor Yashpal, an eminent Scientist and former Chairman of University Grants Commission, has filed Writ Petition No. 19 of 2004 under Article 32 of the Constitution by way of public interest litigation for declaring certain provisions of The Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra, H Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Aur Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 2002 as ultra vires

PROF. YASHPAL v. STATE [G.P. MATHUR, J.] 39

and for quashing of the notifications issued by State of Chhattisgarh in the A purported exercise of power conferred by Section 5 of the said Adhiniyam for establishing various universities .. The other petitioner who has joined in the petition, is a resident of Chhattisgarh and is concerned with the quality of education in his State. The respondent no. I to the petition is the State of Chhattisgarh, respondent no. 2 is the University Grants Commission and, respondent nos. 3 to 94 are the private universities which have been established B .- by the State of Chhattisgarh under the aforesaid Adhiniyam .

2Copy pinpoint2. The Chhattisgarh Legislature enacted the Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra 1

Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Aur Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 2002 (for short 'the• Act') which was published in the Gazette on 4.2.2002 to establish self-financed, private universities for higher education. Under Section 5 of the Act the State has been empowered to incorporate and establish a university by issuing a notification in the Gazette and Section 6 permits such university to affiliate any college or other institution or to set up more than one campus with the prior approval of the State Government. The main averments in the petition are that after coming into force of the Act, the State Government has been, simply by issuing notifications in the Gazette, establishing universities in an indiscriminate and mechanical manner without having slightest regard to the availability of any infrastructure, teaching facility or their financial resources. In a short span of about one year as many as 112 universities were established and many of them had absolutely no buildings or campus and were running from one room tenements. There was absolutely no regulation or supervision over them. The legislation has been enacted in a manner which has completely done away with any kind of control of University Grants Commission (for

- short 'UGC') over these private universities. The guidelines issued by UGC on the courses being taught and award of academic degrees has been given a complete go-by. The universities issued brochures for award of all kinds of degrees like "Member of the International Institute of Medical Sciences", "Fellow of the International Institute of Medical Sciences" and many other similar degrees. The universities are wholly incapable of imparting any education much less a quality education in absence of basic infrastructure like classrooms, libraries, laboratories or campus. Nevertheless by conferment of a legal status of a university, they have been empowered to award degrees. The private universities are running professional courses without taking prior permission from regulatory bodies s.uch as All India Council of Technical Education (AICTE), Medical Council of India (MCI), Dental Council of India (DCI), etc. The requirement of obtaining prior permission from the regulatory bodies has not been followed and the universities are not under the H

40 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2005) 2 S.C.R.

A control of any authority and are at liberty to grant degrees, diplomas and certificates to gullible students. The State Government has not done any verification or checking of universities after issuance of notification in the Gazette, whether they fulfill any norms laid down by the statutory bodies, which is essential for recognition of the degrees, diplomas and certificates B awarded by such universities. In absence of requisite permission from the statutory bodies, the degrees and certificates awarded by such universities would not be recognized by the professional organizations, as a result whereof the students studying in such universities and obtaining the degrees therefrom would suffer immense loss, both in terms of money and also the time spent in completing the courses. It is further averred that the University Grants C Commission Act is made nugatory as private universities are offering courses without subscribing to the standards laid down by the UGC and there being no homogeneity of the course content, the degree awarded may not be of any value. The private universities are offering unheard of courses and degrees which are not part of schedule to the UGC Act, which is in clear violation of Section 22 of the aforesaid Act and the Schedule appended thereto. The D minimum requirement of teaching staff as laid down in the guidelines of ·uac had also been given a complete go-by. Young students are being misled in enrolling themselves in courses which do not have any substantive content and the degrees offered by such private universities would affect the standard of education at large which in tum will jeopardize.the educational system of the whole country and not that of State of Chhattisgarh alone.

3Copy pinpoint3. Some photographs have also been filed which show that a signboard mentioning the name of.the University is put over small room or shop on first or second floor in some congested market area. That they are functioning from small premises which are sometimes a single small room in a commercial complex or a small tenement on the first or second floor of a building or an ordinary flat or MIG house is evident from their address and a few of them are being reproduced below by way of illustration : Respondent No. 3 Thamath University, Raipur I Room No. 201, llnd Floor " G Raipur Commercial Complex Jairam Complex, Raipur.

Respondent No. 13 1.1.L.M. University Mishr Bhawan, I st Floor Tatyapara, Raipur. H

PROF. YASHPAL v. STATE [G.P. MATHUR, J.] 41

.-- f A Respondent No. 36 Supreme University M.l.G. 6, Sector 3 Shankar Nagar, Raipur.

Respondent No. 37 E.M.P.I. University C-9-12, Ist Floor B ~ Ekatam Prishar Rajbandha Maidan, Raipur. Respondent No. 42 Jaipuria University, Raipur I st Floor, Mishr Bhawan; Raipur. Several such univers1t1es are functioning outside the State of c Chhattisgarh, and their addresses as given below demonstrate the said fact : Respondent No. 7 N.1.1.L.M. University 11166, Shershah Suri Marg Mohan Co-operative Industrial Estate, New Delhi. D Respondent No. 9 Lovely University Lovely Auto Complex Dr. Ambedkar Chowk Jalandhar City.

Respondent No. IO E Babu Banarasi Dass University Babu Banarasi Dass Northern Indian Foundation Upper Ground Floor, 338-384, S-Block New Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi. F

Respondent No. 12 Dr. Zakir Hussain National University Unopcharik av Anvrat Shikshan Sansthan Satellite Centre, Balley Road Patna. Respondent No. 45 Bio-Informatics, Bio-Tech. and Life G ; Science University, Raipur Bio- lnformatic Institute of India B-5, Sector 3 Noida. ( Respondent No. 46 Institute of Business Administration (N.C.D. Office) Ground Floor E-382, H

42 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2005] 2 S.C.R.

A Greater Kailash Part II New Delhi.

Respondent No. 53 Adarsh University of Science & Technology, Chhattisgarh, N.I.C.I. Society, 54, Todannal Road Bengali Market New Delhi. B

4Copy pinpoint4. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 565 of 2003 has been filed by Gopal Ji Agarwal with the $ame prayer, namely, that the Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Aur Viniyaman) Adhiniyam 2002 be declared as ultra vires being violative of Constitution of India, and also contrary to the provisions of University Grants Commission Act, 1956, Indian Medical C Council Act, 1956,. All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 and Bar Council of India Act, 1956: A further· prayer has been made that a writ of prohibition ·ma}'. be issued restr~inirig:thi private universities incorporated: . .i under the aforesaid Act from imparting any education and conferring any degrees or diplomas. The avetments made in the writ petition are substantially the same as made in the writ petition filed by Prof. Yash Pal, that a large number of universities have been incorporated by merely issuing gazette notifications though they do not have any kind of infrastructure or teaching facility and are functioning from orie room tenement in a second or third floor in a residential. or commercial b1,1ilding and without any teaching staff. The universities !)ave been established :merely.to confer degrees and they have on theirown created a large number of degrees and diploma's which are totally unhea~d of. The universities had issued advertisements for opening up study centres in different parts of t~e country for award of any number of degrees and diplomas. By way of illu~tration, copies of advertisements issued by some of the universities have been filed. One of such university, namely, the Indian University, issued an advertisement inviting applications for Nodal Service Centres/University Centres for awarding the following kind of degrees and diplomas : .

Master of Biotechnology Administration (MBA) 2 Yrs.

Master of Insurance Management (MIM) 2 Yrs. G M. Tech . in Bioinformatics .. 2 Yrs. . .

M. Tech VLSI (Vet)t' La~ge s·cale lntg: 'circuits) 2 Yrs.·· M. Tech Elect. Mechanics & Power Semi H Conductor Drive 2 Yrs.

PROF. YASl-IPAL v. STATE [G.P. MATHUR . .I.] 43'

-) M. Tech Energy Management Systems 2 Yrs. A M.Sc. Cheminformatics (lntg)/Bioinformatics(lntg) 5 Yrs.

. M.Sc. Biotechnology (lntg.) 5 Yrs .

M.Sc. Bioinformatics/Biotechnology 2 Yrs. B . B.Sc. with Bioinformatics/Microbiology/ Biotechnology 3 Yrs.

B.Sc. with Automobiles Science 3 Yrs.

PGD in Biotech Marketing I Yr. c . PGD in Imaging (Ct Scan) & (MRI) 2 Yrs .

. POD in Bioinformatics - 1.5 Yrs .

. PG Diploma in Cheminformatics 1 Yr . D . PG Diploma in Mobile Technology 1 Yr .

. PG Diploma in Energy Audit and Conservation l Yr .

. PG Diplorna in Acturial/Sciences in Bioinformatics - l Yr. E The writ petitioner, not knowing the correct facts, responded for opening up a study centre and he was asked to deposit Rs. 50,000 which he did by two Demand Draft!i. On enquiry regarding prior permission from Medical Council of India, the Registrar of the Indian University issued a certificate which reads as under : .f "Certified that following PARA MEDICAL COURSES are approved by INDIAN UNIVERSITY, RAIPUR.

(1) BP T - 2 Year G (2) Bachelor of Ophthalmology - 2 Year

....-- (3) B M L T - 4 Year

(4) PG Diploma in Imaging (MRI) - I Year

It is further certified that for Para Medical Course MCI approval is H

44 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2005) 2 S.C.R.

A not required and it is not covered by MCI also."

It is further averred that the Indian University, Raipur also issued an '· - advertisement inviting applications for admission to certain types of technical courses in its alleged campus at Graduate School of Business & Administration, Greater Noida, which is in the district of Gautam Budh Nagar, in the State B of UP and it was mentioned therein that the candidates may apply to the Registrar by sending a Bank Draft of Rs. 800. A photocopy of the advertisement has been filed. It has thus been submitted that though the private universities have no infrastructure for imparting any kind of education, they were alluring people all over the country to open study centres for c which they were charging huge amount and also befooling students to apply for admission to wholly unknown and unheard of technical, medical and ..J other professional courses which are not recognized by any statutory authority, and thereby a substantial amount of money has been collected.

5Copy pinpoint5. In a stereotyped manner Gazette notifications were issued notifying D a University and by way of illustration one "such notification is being reproduced below :

"Raipur, the l lth October, 2002

No. F. 679/ ........... ./02. - In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- Section (I) of Section 5 of .the Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra '""""" E Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Aur Viniyaman), Adhiniyam, 2002 (No. ' . 2 of 2002) for extensi.m of Higher/Technical Education in '

Chhattisgarh, hereby, establishes a University known as "Indian University, Raipur" with.effect from the date of publication of this notification in the Chhattisgarh Gazette and the jurisdiction of the F University shall extend over whole of Chhattisgarh.

2. The Head Office of the University shall be at Raipur.

3. The State Government, hereby authorizes "Indian University, Raipur" to conduct the syllabus and to grant degree or diplomas for which it shall be recognized or authorized as may be required under. any other law for the time being in force." ~

6Copy pinpoint6. Several legal issues have also been raised in the writ petitions and '1 the principal being that the manner in which these private universities are functioning would result in creating a complete chaos in the system of higher education in the country and -the expert bodie.s created by the Central

PROF. YASHPAL v. STATE [G.P. MATHUR, .I.] 45

' Government like, University Grants Commission, Medical Council of India, A All India Council for Technical Education etc. for coordination and determination of standards in their own respective fields would not be able to perform their statutory duty and would make their functioning not only difficult but almost impossible.

7Copy pinpoint7. The State of Chhattisgarh has filed brief but almost identical counter affidavits in both the writ petitions. The main plea taken therein is that in view of Entry 32 List II of Seventh Schedule to the Constitution, the State has the legislative competence to make an enactment regarding incorporation of a University. The impugned Act had been passed to facilitate establishment of private Universities with a view to create supplementary resources for assisti~g the State Government in providing quality higher education. The notifications establishing the Universities were issued on the basis of the representations made by the sponsoring bodies as set out in their project reports. The State Government expected that the Universities would make the requisite infrastructure including campus, building, etc. and recruit qualified staff so as to provide higher education in order to achieve the object for which the Universities .were established. However, the functioning of the Universities post notification was dismal and completely belied the expectations which the State Government had in that behalf, raising serious concern about the academic interests of the students seeking admission therein. The State Legislature, accordingly, enacted the Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra E Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Aur Viniyaman) Sansodhan Adhiniyam, 2004. After expiry of the time limit fixed in the aforesaid amending Act, 59 Universities were de-notified on account of their failure to comply with the amended provisions. It is further averred that after the Act had been amended in the year 2004, the petitioners' grievance has been completely met and consequently the writ petitions deserve to be dismissed. F

8Copy pinpoint8. Before we advert to the principal submission oflearned counsel for the parties regarding the vires of Section 5 and 6 of the Act, it is necessary to take note of the relevant constitutional provisions dealuig with education and Universities, both under Government of India A~t, 1935, and the Constitution. G SEVENTH SCHEDULE OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ACT, 1935

LIST I - FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE LIST

12. Federal agencies and institutes for the following purposes, that is H

46 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2005] 2 S.C.R.

A to say, for research, for professional or technical training, or for l,

the promotion of special studies.

13. The Banaras Hindu University and the Aligarh Muslim University.

LIST II - PROVINCIAL LEGJSLA TIVE LIST

B 17. Education including Universities other than specified .in paragraph 13 of List I.

33. The incorporation, regulation, and winding up corporations (not being Corporations specified in List :I or Universities); unincorporated trading, :IHerary, scientific, religious and other c societies and associations; co-operative societies. ....... ' SEVENTH SCHEDULE TO THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA UST I - UNION UST

63. The institutions known at the commencement of this Constitution as the Banaras Hindu University, the Aligarh Muslim Univ1ersity D and the Delhi University; the Univ.ersity established in pursuance ·Of article 371E; any other institution declared by Parliament by Jaw to be an institution of national importance.

64. ·Institutions for scientific or technical education financed by the Government of .India wholly or in :part and declared by Parliament E by law to be institutions of national importance.

65. Union agencies and institutions for -

(a) professional, vocational or technical .training, including the training of police officers; or . F (b) the promotion of special studies ·Of research; or

(c} scientific or technical assistance iri the investigation or detection of crime.

66. Co-ordination and determination of standards in institutions for G higher education or r.esearch and scientific and technical education.

UST II - STATE UST

11. Education including universities, subject to the provisions of H Entries 63., 64, 65 and 66 of List I and Entry 25 of List m.

PROF. YASHPAL v. STATE [G.P. MATHUR, .I.] 47

(This Entry was deleted by Forty-second Amendment Act) A

32. Incorporation, regulation and winding up of corporation, other than those specified in List I, and universities; unincorporated trading, literary, scientific, religious and other societies and associations; co-operative societies.

---- LIST III - CONCURRENT LIST

25. Education, including technical education, medical .education and B

universities, subject to the provisions of entries 63, 64, 65 and 66 of List I; vocational and technical training of labour.

The Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 which came into force on 3.1.1977 omitted Entry 11 from List II and transferred that subject to be combined with Entry 25 of List III.

9Copy pinpoint9. The foundation for a federal set up for the nation was laid in the Government of India Act, 1935. though in every respect the distribution of legislative power between the Union and the States as envisaged in the 1935 Act has not been adopted in the Constitution but the basic framework is same. It will be seen that Entry 17 in List II of Seventh Schedule in Government of India Act specifically provided for Universities and the same is now part of Entry 32 in List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. Entries 17 and 33 of List ll of Government of India Act have been combined and made one composite entry (Entry 32) in List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution.

10Copy pinpoint10. How the word "Universities" occurring as a legislative head in the Seventh Schedule should be interpreted, one has to look to the legislative practice regarding interpretation ofConstitUtional entries. For this purpose, it wiil be useful to refer to some well-known decisions.

In South Carolina v. United States; .. (1905) 199 US 437, the principle was stated as under :

"To determine the extent of the grants of power, we must, therefore, place ourselves in the position of the men who framed and adopted the Constitution, and inquire what they must have understood to be the meaning and scope of those grants."

In Ex parte Grossman, (1925) 267 US 87, the U.S. Supreme Court H

48 SUPREME COURT REPORTS {2005) 2 S.C.R.

A observed that the language of the Constitution cannot be interpreted safely except by reference to the common law and to British institutions as they were when the instrument was framed and adopted. In Croft v. Dunphy, (1933) AC 156, it was held as under :

"When a power is conferred to legislate on a particular topic it is B important, in determining the scope of the power, to have regard to what is ordinarily treated as embraced 'within that topic in legislative practice and particul~rly _in the legislatiye practice of the State which has conferred the power. Thus in considering what might be appropriately and legitimately enacted in relation to "bankruptcy and insolvency" it was considered relevant to discuss the usual co1t1tents c of bankruptcy statutes."

Similarly,in Wallace Brothers and Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income- /ax, Bombay, AIR (1948) PC 118, the Judicial Committee observed that where Parliament has conferred a power to legislate on a particular topic it is permissible and important in determining the scope and meaning of the power to have regard to what is ordinarily treated as embraced within that topic in the legislative practice of the United Kingdom. The object is to ascertain the general conception involved in the words in the enabling Act.

I I. In Constitutional Law of India by Seervai, the learned author has said in para 2.12 (3rd ed.) that the golden rule of interpretation is that words should be read in their ordinary, natural and grammatical meaning subject to the rider that in construing words in a Constitution conferring legislative power the most liberal construction should be put upon the words so that they may have effect in their widest amplitude. This is subject to certain excer1tions F and a restricted meaning may be given to words if it is ·necessary to pr.event a conflict between two exclusive entries. 'I ;,.

12Copy pinpoint12. The framers of the Constitution having adopted (with some modification) the legislative entries on Universities from the Govemm~:nt of India Act, 1935 made by the British Parliament, the full content and ampl.itude G, of the entry can be comprehended by examining how a University is understood and what'is its concept in U.K. and U.S.A. whose pattern was followed in several matters and which the founding fathers had in their mind.

13Copy pinpoint13. In Volume 15 Halsbury's Laws of England (Fourth ed. Reissue) what is a University and how it is incorp?rated is described as under.; H

PROF. YASHPAL v. STATE [G.P. MATHUR, J.] 49

Para 256. Generq/. A university is the whole body of teachers and scholars engaged, at a particular place, in giving and receiving instruction in the higher branches of learning; such persons associated together as a society or corporate body, with definite organization and acknowledged powers and privileges (especially that of conferring degrees), and forming an institution for the promotion of education in the higher or more impor:int :>rnnches of learning; also, the colleges, buildings and other property belonging to such a body. Although the institutions to which it refers are readily identifiable, precise and accurate definition is difficult. The essential feature of a university seems to be that it was incorporated as such by the sovereign power. C Other attribu~es of a university appear to be the admission of students from all parts .of the world, a plurality of masters, the teaching of one at least of the higher faculties, namely theology, law or philosophy (which in some definitions are regarded as identical) and medicine, provision for residence and the right to D confer degrees, but possession of these attributes will not make an institution a university in the absence of any express intention of the sovereign power to make it one. A university involves the relation of tutor and pupil; it is charged with the supervision and upbringing of the pupil under tuition. Incorporation was anciently effected by papal grant or charter, and later by royal charter or E Act of Parliament.

The practice adopted in the case of the most recent foundations· is to incorporate the university by royal charter, to which there is annexed a schedule containing the original statutes of the university, and thereafter to obtain the passing· of a local If' Act of Parliament vesting in the university the property and liabilities of any institution which it replaces and making other necessary provisions.

A copy of any application for a charter for the foundation of any college or university which is referred by the Queen in G Council for the report of a committee of the Privy Council must be laid before Parliament, together with a copy of the draft charter, for not less than 30 days before the committee reports upon it.

In 15A American Jurisprudence 2d "University" has been defined as under: H

so SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2005] 2 S.C.R.

A Para 1. Definitions.

Properly speaking, a "university" is an aggregation or union of colleges. It is an institution in which the education imparted is universal, embracing many branches, such as the arts, sciences, and all manner of higher learning, and which B possesses the power to confer degrees indicating proficiency in the branches taught. The word "college" has been said to be employed in the United States to indicate an institution of learning, having co~orate powers, and possessing the right to confer degrees,

c and which, with reference to its educational work, consists of the trustees, teachers, and scholars, all of whom make up the membership of the college and represent its active work. The term "college" may also be used to indicate a building, or group of buildings, in which scholars are housed, fed, instructed, and governed while qualifying for university degrees, whether the university includes a number of colleges or a single college. In a broad sense, the terms "college" and "university" convey the same idea, differing only in grade, with each indicating an institution of learning consisting of trustees, teachers, and scholars as making up its membership and representing its active work, or an institution engaged in imparting knowledge to resident students and possessing the right to confer degrees.

In the footnote to this paragraph reference is made to a decision which has some kind of similarity with the case in hand and the footnote reads as under : F A school offering correspondence courses in professional and other educational subjects, sending students textbooks and lessons to study, giving examinations based thereon, and awarding diplomas or degrees, but having no entrance requirements, resident students, library, laboratory, or faculty, is not a university. Branch G v. Federal Trade Com., (CA7) 141 F2d 31. In the New Encyclopedia Britannica (15th ed) "University" has been described as under :

(Page 165) University, institution of higher education, usually comprising a -H liberal arts and sciences college and graduate and professional

PROF. YASHPALv. STATE [G.P. MATHUR, .I.] 51 . schools and having the authority to confer degrees in various A' fields of study.

(Page 186) Universities and students looked toward ways of creating opportunities for' a satisfying career outside traditional roles for B graduates in scholarship, teaching, and the professions. The university's basic traditional functions remain unchanged - enabling students to learn from their cultural heritage, helping them to realize their intellectual and creative abilities, and encouraging them to become humane and responsible people. The university expands knowledge across the entire spectrum of q disciplines, and it can add to the understanding and enjoyment of life. It continues to be needed for imaginative solutions to the problems of society.

14Copy pinpoint14. Shortly after independence on 4.11.1948 the Government of India constituted a Commission known as "University E~ucation Commission" of which Dr. S. Radhakrishnan was. the Chairman. Dr. Tara Chand, former Vice-Chancellor, Allahabad University, Dr. Zakir Hussain, Vice-Chancellor, Aligarh Muslim University, Dr. A. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar, Vice- Chancellor, Madras University, Dr. Meghnad Saha, Dean, Faculty of Science, Calcutta University and 5 other eminent personalities in the field of education were its members. The Commission gave a very long and exhaustive report. Chapter II of the report deals with the aims of University education and Para 2 of Part I is illustrative and the same is being reproduced below :

"2. Universities as the Organs of Civilization-He indeed must be blind who does not see that, mighty as are the political changes, far deeper are the fundamental questions which will be decided by what happens in the universities. Everything is being brought to the test of reason, venerable theologies, ancient political institutions, time- honoured social arrangements, a thousand things which a generation ago looked as fixed as the hills. If India is to confront the confusion of our time, she must turn for guidance, not to those who are lost in the mere exigencies of the passing hour, but to her men of letters, and men of science, to her poets and artists, to her discoverers and inventors. These intellectual pioneers of civilization are to be found and trained in the universities, which are the sanctuaries of the inner life of the nation." H

52 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2005] 2 S.C.R.

A In the introductory paragraph of Chapter IV dealing with standards of teaching, the Commission recorded its views in the following words :

The need for High Standards.

Introduction • It is the primary duty of a university to maintain the B highest standards of its teaching and examinations. A university is a place of higher education where the personality and capacities of the students are developed to the utmost by teachers who should themselves be at work at the frontiers of knowledge in their respective fields. The success of a university is to be judged as much by the type of graduate it turns out as by the amount and quality of research c contributed by its teachers and research students. It must be clearly recognized that there is no conflict involved between the twofold function of a university to educate its members and to advance the frontiers of knowledge the two functions are, in fact, complementary. Unless high standards of teaching and examinations are maintained, research will suffer, since research can continue uninterruptedly only if there is a regular supply of graduates well prepared by general education for specialized research work. On the other hand, if research is neglected by teachers, their teaching will lack vitality and will rapidly become stale. A degree must always be what a university makes it by the kind of teaching it imparts and the type of intellectual and social life it provides for its members. If our universities are to be the makers of future leaders of thought and action in the country, as they should be, our degrees must connote a high standard of scholarly achievement in our graduates.

The Commission noted that many of the Universities did not compare favourably with the best of British and American universities in respect of their teaching and examination standards. Unless highest standards of teaching in the Universities are ensured, the degree given by them will not command recognition and respect. The Commission observed :

" ..... Our universities should maintain the academic character of their work on a level recognized as adequate by the universities of other countries. Universities are our national institutions, and to keep up our national prestige, our degrees must be such as to command international recognition ..... "

H. 15. The Government of lndia constituted a Committee in Decefuber,

PROF. YASHPAL v. STATE [G.P. MATHUR . .I.] 53

1961 to consider broadly the organizational structure of the Universities in A India and to prepare the outline of a "Model Act" suited to their role and functions of which Dr. D.S. Kothari, Chairman, UGC was the Chairman and several other persons who were either Vice-Chancellors of Universities or were connected with the field of education were members: In the concluding part of the First Chapter, the Committee noted as under : B " ..... The function of the university is not only to preserve, disseminate and advance knowledge but also to furnish intellectual leadership and moral tone to society. No less important is the role of universities in promoting national integration and a common culture, and in bringing about the social transformation that is desired. Finally, universities C

.. have also to provide trained personnel to advance the country's prosperity by making full use of modern knowledge. The organizational pattern must enable the universities to achieve these objectives."

These reports prepared by most learned and eminent educationists in post independence era highlight the primary function of the Universities viz, teaching and research and to provide trained and qualified personnel for the progress of the nation.

16Copy pinpoint16. Though incorporation of a University as a legislative head is a State subject (Entry 32 List If) but basically University is an institution for higher education and research. Entry 66 of List I is coordination and determination of standards in institutions for higher education or research and scientific iind technical institutions. There can thus be a clash between the powers of the State and that of the Union. The interplay of various entries in this regard in the three lists of the Seventh Schedule and the real import of Entry 66 of List I have been examined in several decisions of this Court. In Gujarat University F. v. Shri Krishna, AIR (1963) SC 703, a decision by a Constitution ~ench rendered prior to Forty-second Amendment when Entry I I of List II was in existence, it was held that Item No. 63 to 66 of List I are carved out .of the subject of education and in respect of these items the power to legislate i~ vested exclusively in the Parliament. The use of the expression "subject to" G • in item I I of List II of the Seventh Schedule clearly indicates that the legislation in respect of excluded matters cannot be undertaken by the State Legislatures. In para 23, the Court held as under :

" ...... Power of the State to legislate in respect of education including Universities must to the extent to which it is entrusted to the Union H

54 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2005] 2 S.C.R.

A Parliament, whether such power is exercised or not, be deemed to be restricted. If a subject of legislation is covered by items 63 to 66 even if it otherwise falls within the larger field of "education including Universitie.s" power to legislate on that subject lnust lie with the Parliament. .........................................,.......................... ;................................. . ............................... Item 11 of List II and item 66 of List I must be B harmoniously construed. The two entries undoubtedly overlap; but to ·the extent of overlapping, the power conferred by item 66 List I must prevail over the power of the State under item 11 of List II. It is manifest that the excluded heads deal primarily with education in institutions of national or special importance and institutions of higher c education including research, sciences, technology and vocational training of labour.

The following observations in paras 24 and 25 highlight the supremacy of legislation made by the Parliament with reference to Entry 66 :

D "24 ....... The validity of the State legislation on University education and as regards the education in technical and scientific institutions not falling within Entry 64 of List I would have to be judged having regard to whether it ~impinges on the field reserved for the Union under Entry 66. In other words, the validity of State legislation would depend upon whether it prejudidally affects co-ordination and E determination of standards, but not upon the existence of some definite Union legislation directed to achieve that purpose. If there be Union

• legislation in respect of co-ordination and determination of standards, that would have paramountcy over the State law by virtue of the first part of Ar. 254(1); even ifthat power be not exercised by the Union F Parliament the relevant legislative entries being in the exclusive lists, a State law trenching upon the Union field would still be invalid.

25 ...... Item No. 66 is a legislative head and in interpreting it, unless it is expressly or of necessity found conditioned by the words used therein, a narrow or restricted interpretation will not be put upon the G generality of the words. Power to legislate on a subject should normally be held to extend to all ancillary or subsidiary matters which can fairly and reasonably be said to be comprehended in that subject. Again there is nothing either in item 66 or elsewhere in the Constitution which supports the submission 'that the expression "co-ordination" must mean in the context in which it is used merely evaluation, co- H ordination in its normal connotation means harmonising or bringing

PROF. YASHPAL v. STATE [G.P. MATHUR, .I.] 55

-, into proper relation in which all the things co-ordinated participate in a common pattern of action. The power to co-ordinate, therefore, is A

not merely power to evaluate, it is a power to harmonise or secure relationship for concerted action. The power conferred by item 66 List I is not conditioned by the existence of a state of emergency or unequal standards calling for the exercise of the power." B

17Copy pinpoint17. The same question was also examined in considerable detail in State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. v. Adhiyaman Educational and Research Institute, [ 1995) 4 SCC I04 and the conclusions drawn were summarized in para 41 of the reports and sub-paras (i) and (ii) thereof are being reproduced below: c (i) The expression 'coordination' used in Entry 66 of the Union List of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution does not merely mean evaluation. It means harmonisation with a view to forge a uniform pattern for a concerted action according to a certain design, scheme or plan of development. It, therefore, includes action not only for removal of disparities in standards but also for preventing the occurrence of such disparities. It would, therefore, also include power to do all things which are necessary to prevent what would make 'coordination' either impossible or difficult. This power is absolute and unconditional and in the abs.ence of the valid compelling reasons, it must be given its full effect according to its plain and express intention. (ii) To the extent that the State legislation is in conflict with the

- Central legislation though the former is purported to have been made under Entry 25 of the Concurrent List but in effect encroaches upon legislation including subordinate legislation made by the Centre under Entry 25 of the Concurrent List or to give effect to Entry 66 of the Union List, it would be void and inoperative.

18Copy pinpoint18. In Osmania University Teachers Association v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Anr., [ 1987) 4 SCC 671, the Court reiterated that it was the exclusive responsibility of the Central Government to determine the standards for higher education and the same should not be lowered at the hands of any particular State as it was of great importance to national progress. After referring to the Constitution Bench decision in Kera/a State Electricity Board v. Indian Aluminium Co., [1976) I Sec 466, where it was held that when an H

56 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2005] 2 S.C.R.

A entry is in general terms in List II and part of that entry is in specific terms in List I, the entry in List I takes effect notwithstanding the entry in List II, the Court held as under in para 14 of the reports :

"14. Entry 25 List 1II relating to education including technical education, medical education and universities has been made subject B to the power of Parliament to legislate under Entries 63 to 66 of List I. Entry 66 List I and Entry 25 List III should, therefore, be read together. Entry 66 gives power to Union to see that a required standard of higher education in the country is maintained. The standard of Higher Education including scientific and technical should not be

c lowered at the hands of any particular State or States. Secondly, it is the exclusive responsibility of the Central Government to coordinate and determine the standards for higher education. That power includes the power to evaluate, harmonise and secure proper relationship to any project of national importance. It is needless to state that such a co-ordinate action in higher education with proper standards, is of D paramount importance to national progress. It is in this national interest, the legislative field in regard to 'education' has been distributed between List I and List III of the Seventh Schedule."

19Copy pinpoint19. The interplay of Entry 66 List I and Entry 25 List III was again examined by a Constitution Bench in Dr. Preeti Srivastava and Anr. v. State E of MP. and Ors., [1999] 7 sec 120 in the context of lowering of standards by the State for admission to a Post Graduate course in a Medical College and it was held that the State cannot while controlling education in the State impinge on standards in institutions for higher education because this is exclusively within the purview of the Union Government While considering the question whether norms for admission have any connection with the )

standards of education and that they are only covered by Entry 25 of List Ill, I , it was observed that any lowering of the norms of admission does have an adverse effect on the standards of education in the institutions of higher education. The standard of education in an institution depends on various factors like, (i) the caliber of teaching staff; (ii) a proper syllabus designed to achieve high level of education in a given span of time; (iii) the student- teacher ratio; (iv) equipment and laboratory facilities; (v) caliber of the students admitted; (vi) adequate accommodation in the institution; (vii) the standard of examinations held including the manner in which the papers are set and examined; and (viii) the evaluation of practical examinations done. It was pointed out that education involves a continuous interaction between the

PROF. YASl-IPAL v. STATE [G.P. MATHUR . .I.] 57

---' ' teachers and the students. The base of teaching, the level to which teaching can rise and the benefit which the students ultimately receive depends as much on the caliber of the students as on the caliber of the teachers and the availability of adequate infrastructural facilities.

20Copy pinpoint20. The consistent and settled view of this Court, therefore, is that in spite of incorporation of Universities as a legislative head being in the State B List, the whole gamut of the University which will include teaching, quality of education being imparted, curriculum, standard of examination and evaluation and also research activity being carried on will not come within the purview of the State legislature on account of a specific Entry on co- ordinatio.n and determination of standards in institutions for higher education C or research and scientific and technical education being in the Union List for which the Parliament alone is competent. It is the responsibility of the Parliament to ensure that proper standards are maintained in institutions for higher education or research throughout the country and also uniformity in standards is maintained. D

21Copy pinpoint21. In order to achieve the aforesaid purpose, the Parliament has enacted the University Grants Commission Act. First para of the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 (for short "UGC Act") is illustrative and consequently it is being reproduced below :

"The Constitution of India vests Parliament with exclusive authority in regard to 'co-ordination and determination of standards in institutions for higher education or research and scientific and technical institutions'. It is obvious that neither co-ordination nor determination of standards is possible unless the Central Government has some voice in the determination of standards of teaching imd examination in Universities, both old and new: It is also necessary to ensure that the available resources are utilized to the best possible effect. The problem has become more acute recently 011 account of the tendency to multiply Universities. The need for a properly constituted Commission for determining and allocating to Universities funds made available by the Central Government has also become more urgent on this account.

In the second para it is said that the Commission will also h11ve the power to recommend to any University the measures necessary for the reform and improvement of University education and to advise the University concerned upon the action to be taken for the purpose of implementing such H

r .~ 58 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2005] 2 S.C.R. ·, A recommendation. The Commission will act as an expert body to advise the Central Government on problems connected with the co-ordination of facilities and maintenance of standards in Universities.

22Copy pinpoint22. The preamble of the UGC Act says - an Act to make provision for the coordination and determination of standards in Universities and for that purpose to establish a University Grants Commission. Section 2(f) of this Act defines a University and it means a University established or incorporated by or under a Central Act, a Provincial Act or a State Act, and includes any such institution as may, in consultation with the University concerned, be recognized by the Commission in accordance with the regulations made in this behalf under this Act. Clause 12 provides that it shall be the general duty of the Commission to take, in consultation with the Universities or other bodies concerned, all such steps as it may think fit for the promotion and co-ordination of University education ancj determination and maintenance of standards of teaching, examination and research in Universities, and for the purpose of its functions under the Act, the Commission may do all such acts enumerated in I D sub-sections (a) to U) thereof. Sections 22 and 23 are important. and are being .-- t

reproduced below :

22. Right to confer degrees - (l) The right of conferring or granting degree shall be exercis~d:only···by a Universityest,ablishecj:or inctirporated by 6r ·t.1nder 'a· Central Aet, a· Prbvii:ici~"i Act or a· ·~

E State Act or an institution deemed to be a University under section 3 or an institution specially empowered by an Act of Parliament to confer or grant degrees. (2) Save as provided in sub-section (I), no person or authority shall confer, or grant; or hold himself or itself out as entitled to confer F or grant any degree. (3) For the purpose of this section, "degree' means any such degree as may, with the previous approval of the Central Government, be· specified in this behalf by the Commission by notification in the Official Gazette."

23Copy pinpoint23. Prohibition of the use of the word "University" in certain cases. No institution, whether a corporate_ body or not, other than a University established or incorporateo by or under a Central Act, a Provincial Act or a State Act shall be entitled to have the word "University" associated with its name in any manner whatsoever: H

PROF. YASHPAL v. STATE [G.P. MATHUR • .I.] 59 Provided that nothing in this section shall, for a period of two A years from the commencement of this Act, apply to an institution which immediately before such commencement, had the word "University" associated with its name.

23. It is important to note that in view of Section 22 of UGC Act, the right of conferring or granting degree can be exercised only by University or B - an institution deemed to be University under Section 3 of the aforesaid Act or institution especially empowered by an Act of Parliament to confer or grant degrees. What is a "degree" and what it connotes is not given in the UGC Act but the meaning of the word as given in dictionaries and standard books is as under : · c Webster's Third New A title conferred upon students by a college, International Dictionary university, or professional school upon completion of a unified programme of study carrying a specified minimum of credits, passing of certain examinations, and often completion of a thesis or other independent research project.

2. A grade or class of mem.bership attained in a ritualistic order or society denoting a stage of proficiency often after a set ordeal or examination. Wharton's Law Lexicon The state of a person, as to be a barrister-at- law, or to be a Bachelor or Master of Arts of a University.

) Chambers's Twentieth A mark of distinction conferred by universities, Century Dictionary whether earned by examination or granted as a mark of honour. P. Ramanatha Aiyar A mark of distinction conferred upon a student. G Law Lexicon (2nd Ed) for proficiency in some art or science; University diploma of specified proficiency.

60 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2005) 2 S.C.R.

A Encyclopedia Americana

"DEGREE" - the title conferred by a college or university, signifying that a certain step or grade has been attained in an area of learning. The award of a diploma conferring the bachelor's degree marks completion of undergraduate study. The master's and doctor's B . degrees reward graduate study. Other degrees constitute evidence of preparation for professional work - the M.D. (doctor of medicine) for example.

In the 20th century, however, the M.A. is granted in American universities and in those of England and the Commonwealth of Nations C (apart from Oxford and Cambridge) on the basis of study beyond the B.A and the presentation (usually) of a thesis.· An exception is Scotland, where the M.A. has been the first degree conferred in all six universities ever since their founding. The bachelor of philosophy and bachelor of letters degrees are given for work beyond the M.A.

D The N_ew Encyclopedia Britannica

"Degree" in education, any of several titles conferred by colleges and universities to indicate th(( extent of academic achievement. The hierarchy of degrees, dating from the 13th century, once resembled · the medieval guild system. In the United States and Great Britain, the modern gradation of academic degrees is usually bachelor (or baccalaureate), master, and doctor. With some exceptions, intermediate degrees,· su·ch as those of bachelor and master, have been abandoned in the universities of continental Europt>.

A degree conferred by a University i~ a proof of the fact that a person has studied a course of a particular higher level and has successfully passed r the examination certifying his proficiency in the said subject of study to such level. In the case of a Doctorate degree, it certifies that the holder ·of the degree has attained a high level of knowledge and study in the concerned subject by doing some original research work .. A University degree confers G a kind of a status upon a person like a graduate or a post-graduate. Those who have done research work and have obtained a Ph.D., D.Lit., or D.Sc. degree become entitled to write the word "Doctor" before their name and command certain amount of respect in society as educated and knowledgeable persons. That apart the principal advantage of holding a University degree is in the matter of employment, where a minimum qualification like a graduate, H

PROF. YASHPAL v. STATE [G.P. MATHUR . .I.] 61

post-graduate or a professional degree from a recognized institute i's prescribed, A Even for those who do not want to take up a job and want to remain in private profession like a doctor or lawyer, registration with Medical Council or Bar Council is necessary for which purpose a degree in medicine or law, as the case may be, from an institution recognized by the said bodies is essential. An academic degree is, therefore, of great significance and value for the holder thereof and goes a long way in shaping his future. The interest of society also requires that the holder of an academic degree must possess the requisite proficiency and expertise in the subject which the degree certifies.

24Copy pinpoint24. Mere confennent of degree is not enough. What is necessary is that the degree should be recognized. It is for this purpose that the right to confer degree has been given under Section 22 of UGC Act only to a University established or incorporated by or under a Central Act, Provincial Act or State Act or an institution deemed to be a University under Section 3 or an institution specially empowered by an Act. of Parliament to confer or grant degrees. Sub-section (3) of this Section provides that "degree" means any such degree as may, with the previous approval of the Central Government, be specified in this behalf by the Commission by notification in the Official Gazette. The value and importance of such degrees which are recognized by Government was pointed out by a Constitution Bench in Azeez Basha v. Union of India, AIR (1968) SC 662.

25Copy pinpoint25. Having seen what is the concept of a University and what is the value of a degree awarded by it, the Scheme and the provisions of the impugned Act may now be examined. The Preamble of the Act says that it is an Act to provide for establishment of self financed private Universities for· imparting Higher Education and to regulate their functions and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. Some of the provisions of the Act p which ·have a bearing on the controversy involved are being reproduced below~

Section 2. In this Adhiniyam, unless the context otherwise requires - (a) "Ordinance" means an Ordinance of the University; G (b) "Sponsoring Body" in relation to a University means- (i) a Society registered under the Madhya Pradesh Societies Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973 (No. 44 of 1973)

(ii) any. Public Trust; or H

62 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2005) 2 S.C.R.

A (iii) a Company registered under Secti0n 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 (No. I of 1956);

(c) "Statute" means a Statute of the University;

(d) "University" means a University established under sub· section (1) of Section 5. B

3. The objects ofthe University shall be-

I. to provide instructions, teaching and training in Higher Education and make provisions for research, advancement and dissemination of knowledge; c 2. to create higher levels of intellectual abilities;

3. to establish state of the art facilities for education and training;

4. to carry out teaching and research and offer continuing education programmes;

D 5. to create centres of excellence-for research and devek>pment and for sharing•knowledge and its application;

6. to provide consultancy to the industry ~nd public organizations;

7. to establish main campus in Chhattisgarh and to have study centres E at different places in India and other countries;

8. ' to establish examination centres;

9. to institute degrees, diplomas; certificates and other academic distinctions on the basis of examination, or any other method of evaluation; ( F

10. to pursue any other objective as may be approved by the.State Government;

l l. to ensure that the standard of the degrees, diplomas, certificates and other academic distinctions are not lower than those laid down by AICTE/NCTE/UGC/MCI and Pharmacy Council etc; G

4. (1) An application containing the Project Report to establish A University for carrying out any or all of the objects enumerated in section 3 of this Adhiniyam shall be made to the State Government by the Sponsoring Body along with such fee as may be prescribed .. H

PROF. YASHPAI., v. STATE [G.P. MATHUR, J.] 63

(2) The Project Report shall contain the following particulars, namely- A (a) the objects of the University along with the details of the Sponsoring Body;

(b) the extent and the status of the University and the availability of land; B (c) the nature and the type of programmes of study and research to be undertaken in the University during a period not less than the next five years;

(d) the nature of faculties, courses of study and research proposed to be started; c (e) the campus development such as building, equipment and structural amenities;

(f) the phased outlays of capital expenditure for a period not less than the next five years; D

(g) the item-wise recurring expenditure, sources of finance and estimated expenditure for each student;

(h) the scheme for mobilizing resources and the cost of capital thereto and the manner of repayments to the Sponsoring E Body and other sources;

(i) the scheme for the generation of funds internally through the recovery of fee from students, revenues anticipated from consultancy and other activities relating to the objects of the University, and other anticipated incomes; F ,., G) the details of expenditure on unit cost and the extent of concessions or rebates. in fee or freeship and scholarship for students belonging to the Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes, belonging to economically weaker sections, in lieu G ·of land grants if any, from the State Government, subject to the condition that the number of students getting concessions

- and freeships or scholarships shall not be less than twenty two and one half percent of the total number of seats. The proposed fee structure shall also indicate the rationale for the varying rates of fee that would be levied on non resident H

64 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2005) 2 S.C.R.

_A Indians and students of other nationalities;

(k) the years of experience and expertise in the concerned disciplines at the command of the Sponsoring Body as well as the financial resources;

B (I) the system to select students for admission to the courses of study at the University; .

(m) such other details as may be prescribed by rules framed under this Adhiniyam. ·

c (3) The State Government, on receipt of the Project Report shall make such enquiry as it may deem necessary within forty five days from the date of submission of the Project Report.

(4) If the State Government is satisfied with the proposal to establish the University, it may, subject to such conditi~ns as may be specified, D accord the sanction for the same.

5. (1) The State Government may by notification in the Gazette establish a University by such name and with such jur~sdiction and location of campus as may be specified therein having regard to -

E. (a) the desirability to establish a University;

(b) recognition or authorization as may be required under any other Jaw for the time being in force to conduct the syllabus and to grant _degrees or diplomas or awards.

(2) Every notification issued under sub-section (I) shall be laid on F the table of the Legislative Assembly.

6. (I) Every University established under sub-section (I) of section 5 shall be a body corporate by the name notified under the said section having perpetual succession and a common seal, and may sue and be sued by the said name. G (2) the University established under sub-section (I) of section 5 may, with the prior approvai of the State Government, affiliate any College or other institution or set up more than one campus."

Section 9 provides that the University shall not be entitled to receive - H any grant cir other financial assistance from the Central Government, State

.. PROF. YASHPAL v. STATE [G.P. MATHUR . .I.I

Government or any other authority except for meeting any amount towards A the fee payable by students belonging to socially disadvantaged or weaker sections of society or for conducting any study for research purposes, etc.