SHIBA KUMAR DUTT A AND ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

The following Order of the Court was delivered :

Delay condoned. F

This special leave petition arises from the orders of the Administra- tive Tribunal, Calcutta Bench, made on June 21, 1995 in OA No. 213 of 1992 and the Review Order dated July 26, 1996.

The admitted' position is that the petitioners, who are working as G Fitters (T & G), had sought to be fused in the category of, and to be on par with, Jig Borers. They sought equal pay on par with them. They contend that they were drawing higher pay-scales than the Fitter; instead of elevating their cadre and placing them in the Higher pay-scales, they have. been brought them down in the category as a Fitter after removing H 467

SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1997) 2 S.C.R.

A the two nomenclatures. Thereby, it is arbitrary on account of invidious discrimination. The Third Pay Commission had gone into that aspect of the matter and fixed the scales of pay. Thereafter, admittedly, Expert Classification Committee and Anomalies Removal Committee had also gone into the matter and made distinction between them. Subsequently, B nomenclature of all of them were removed and fused into one category, namely, Fitter. Nomenclature and fitment is one of executive policy of the Government. Unless the action is arbitrary or there is invidious discrimina- tion between persons similarly situated, doing same type of work, as is pointed out, it would be difficult for the Courts to go into the question of . equation of posts or fitment into a particular scale of pay. They must be C left to be decided by the Expert Committees and Government. The Courts cannot go into them and evaluate the job criteria and scales of pay · prescribed for el'.ch category. Under those circumstances, the Tribunal is justified in refusing to go into the question.

~e special leave petition is aceordingly dismissed. D R.P. Petition dismissed.