STATE OF RATASTHAN v. SEVA RAM AND ORS.
vidhipandit.com/case/sc-1996-2-81-82
Headnote — Supreme Court Reports (editorial summary, not part of the judgment)
Reporter's headnote (continued) and case details
FEBRUARY 2, 1996
B
Constitution of India, 1950:
Art. 136-Grant of special leave-Matters covered by an earlier decision, remitting the matter to High Court-Accordingly in tlze present C matter also, order of High Cowt set aside and matter remitted to High Cowt for disposal along with pending appeals-If these appeals are already dis- posed of, the ratio therein would govern the present case.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 3427 of D 1996.
From the Judgment and Order dated 12.1.94 of the Rajasthan High Court in D.B.C.S.A No. 568 of 1992.
Aruneshwar Gupta for the Appellants. E AP. Medh, Pallav Shishodia for the Respondents.
Judgment
The following Order of the Court was delivered :
Mr. Medh, Advocate appears for respondent No. 1. Respondent F Nos. 2 and 3, though served, are not appearing either in person or through counsel.
Leave granted.
The controversy raised is covered by the order of this Court in C.A. G 3204/95 and batch dated 28.2.1995 wherein delay was condoned and mat- ters were remitted to the High Court for disposal along with the pending appeals for decision on merits. Accordingly, we set aside the order of the High Court and remit this matter to the High Court for disposal along with the pending appeals, if not already disposed of. H 81
82 SUPREME COURT REPORTS · (1996) 2 S.C.R. . . \ . . . A. If they are disposed of, the ratio therein may gover~ the controversy in thi• appeal.
. Appeal i• di•posed of in above terms. No costs.
G.N. Appeal disposed of.
Report an error in this judgment →
Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0